Research & Analysis

Analysis

Defense analysis, intelligence briefs, and commentary on Baltic security — drawing lessons from live conflicts and applying them to Lithuania's defense posture.

Commentary

Lithuania's 'One Month' Defense Debate Reveals a Dangerous Mindset

Lithuanian parliament debated whether the country can defend itself for 'at least one month' without US support. That question reveals the core problem: the entire political class frames defense as survival time before rescue. One month is not a strategy — it's a countdown to capitulation.

  • Opposition lawmakers propose Lithuania should be able to defend itself independently for 'at least one month' — framing defense as survival time before rescue
  • The government maintains plans exist but are classified — no public debate on actual capability
  • The Iran war destroyed the rescue assumption: the US withdrew from the UAE rather than defend it under fire
lithuanianatodeterrencesovereignty
Read full analysis →
Analysis

First Lessons from the Iran War for Lithuanian Defense

Three days into the US-Israel campaign against Iran, the war is rewriting core assumptions about modern conflict. The lessons for Lithuania's defense are urgent: interceptor math is broken, GPS denial is real, and decentralization is survival.

  • Coalition interceptor stocks depleting 2x faster than planned — 10 days instead of 20
  • GPS jamming in the Strait of Hormuz is degrading JDAMs, cruise missiles, and drone ops
  • Iran's decentralized C2 survived 3 days of coalition strikes with operational tempo intact
air-defenseirannatointerceptors
Read full analysis →